LandlordEzy
Case Study

LTB Order on Eviction Dispute for 39 MAC FROST WAY

Case Analysis of Chen v Puvanenthiran

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: September 13, 2023

Order Issued: October 11, 2023

Termination Date: July 31, 2023

Eviction Deadline: August 31, 2023

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-058676-23
Address: 39 MAC FROST WAY, SCARBOROUGH ON M1X0C5
Form Used: N11
Served By: R.C. (Landlord's spouse)
Amount Awarded: Not specified
Decision In Favor: Not specified
Application Type: Eviction based on a signed N11 agreement
RTA Sections: Section 43(1) - Identification of rental unit in notices, Section 212 - Compliance with Act's form and notice requirements

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Xiaoyin Chen
Landlord Rep: Yun Tao Li
Tenant: Bakeerathy Puvanenthiran
Tenant Rep: Thiru Sivapatham
Adjudicator: Not specified
Keywords: N11 agreement, eviction, clerical error, intimidation, tenant rights

⚖️ Decision summary

The hearing focused on the validity of the N11 agreement and whether it was signed under duress.
The adjudicator has yet to provide a final decision on the eviction.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Tenant claims the N11 was signed under pressure without proper understanding or opportunity to consult legal advice.
Landlord asserts the N11 was validly signed and seeks to evict to sell the property.

📑 Findings & determinations

The N11 form had a clerical error with the address, deemed minor and not grounds for dismissal of the application.
Dispute whether the Tenant willingly signed the N11 or was coerced.

💡 Summary points

Landlord applied for eviction based on an N11 agreement.
Dispute over the validity of the N11 due to alleged intimidation and lack of understanding by the Tenant.
Tenant challenged the eviction, citing pressure and lack of opportunity to consult.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not specified