LandlordEzy
Case Study

Eviction Order for Noise and Pet Disturbances

Case LTB-L-017211-22

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: February 7, 2023

Order Issued: 2023-05-01

Termination Date: April 30, 2022

Eviction Deadline: Date not provided

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-017211-22
Address: 301, 70 CONWAY DR, London ON N6E2X2
Form Used: N5
Served By: Landlord
Amount Awarded: Not specified
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction for substantial interference
RTA Sections: Section 64, Section 68(1), Section 68(2)

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Boardwalk General Partnership
Landlord Rep: Carla Livingstone
Tenant: Arturo Lara
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Not specified
Keywords: eviction, substantial interference, N5 notice, noise complaint, pet disturbance

⚖️ Decision summary

Board grants eviction based on substantiated claims of substantial interference.
Tenant's efforts to remedy the situation deemed insufficient.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Landlord seeks eviction citing substantial interference with other tenants' enjoyment due to noise and pet urine.
Two N5 notices served to tenant with specific allegations and required corrections.

📑 Findings & determinations

Both N5 notices were procedurally valid and compliant with section 64 of the Act.
Evidence supports claims of noise and pet disturbances as grounds for eviction.

💡 Summary points

Tenant's dogs caused disturbance by urinating on balcony affecting another tenant.
Noise complaints including yelling and banging leading to police involvement.
Tenant claims issues were resolved after partner who caused disturbances moved out.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not specified

📂 Related by application type

Eviction for substantial interference