Case Study

LTB Order Review Decision on Tenant's Harassment Claim

Review Order for Skinner v White, 2023 ONLTB 32444

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: November 15, 2021

Hearing Date: May 31, 2022

Order Issued: March 6, 2023

Termination Date: November 30, 2020

Eviction Deadline: Not applicable

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-076012-22

Address: 30 Silver Street, Bowmanville Ontario L1C3C5

Form Used: Not specified

Served By: Not specified

Amount Awarded: $3000 (last month’s rent deposit and additional security deposit)

Decision In Favor: Landlord

Application Type: Review of decision on Tenant's application for harassment and substantial interference

RTA Sections: Section 22, Section 23, Section 29(2)

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Jodi White

Landlord Rep: Self Represented

Tenant: Christine Skinner

Tenant Rep: Legal Representative (not named)

Adjudicator: Fabio Quattrociocchi

Keywords: harassment, substantial interference, review order, bias, evidence, jurisdiction

⚖️ Decision summary

Review request denied.
Original order confirmed and remains unchanged.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Tenant alleged landlord's actions forced her to vacate.
Landlord disputed the claims, resulting in initial dismissal.

📑 Findings & determinations

No serious errors in the original proceedings.
Claims outside the Board's jurisdiction were not considered.
Landlord's consent to return deposits was upheld.

💡 Summary points

Tenant's review request for a previous order was denied.
Original claims of harassment and substantial interference were not upheld.
Landlord ordered to return security deposits totaling $3000.

📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram

🏷️ Related by keywords

harassment substantial interference review order bias evidence jurisdiction

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Fabio Quattrociocchi